Some Thoughts on Gender and Sexuality in Fallout: New Vegas

Gender and sexuality matters in Fallout: New Vegas, and it matters because of the perk system, which leads to some intriguing questions as to how gender should be handled in-game.

The gay and straight equivalents of the Black Widow-themed series of perks allow for an increase in damage depending on the perk, and allow for new dialogue options depending on the NPC involved: essentially, allowing for seduction and manipulation.

Now, both genders of characters have access towards manipulating others in the game using these perks, but there’s an important distinction in regards to the quest line in regards to gender that doesn’t involve perks – the Legion. While a woman can side with the Legion, women characters cannot fight in the Legion’s arena. Many people have brought forth arguments as to why it would make sense for a woman to side with the Legion, as the Legion has made it quite clear that women are to be enslaved.

While it may seem like splitting hairs to argue over the plot points of Fallout: New Vegas, it is interesting to tackle the issue of when and why gender should affect the plot line and gameplay. In a game like Fallout (or similar games that Bethesda put out, such as the Oblivion series) where the reality that exists is radically different from our own, the argument of realism is questionable.

It’s also interesting to note that New Vegas chose to include non-straight sexualities in regards to the perk system, which I feel is surprisingly progressive.

Personally I feel as though in regards to featuring gender and sexuality in video games certain players should not be privileged over others. The experiences can be different, but there shouldn’t be a benefit to playing one gender or sexuality over the other to the point where it dramatically influences whether or not the player will play as that character. This is a different argument than whether or not developing teams have a responsibility to create an environment that doesn’t encourage misogyny or homophobia. This is an argument based on maximizing the benefits of all players.

In the case of New Vegas, the difference between genders isn’t exactly enough to qualify as being unfair even if you count being locked out of the Legion arena. However, it does raise the question of whether or not games should consider all options and provide workarounds for both – for example, the desire of any player to play as a woman who is also a Legion supporter.

Let me know what you think.


4 thoughts on “Some Thoughts on Gender and Sexuality in Fallout: New Vegas

  1. You’re just sad because you have no life and are worried about something nobody cares about. It makes sense women can’t fight in the arena based off the legion’s ideals. If you don’t like it just side with NCR and get over yourself.


    1. John: I like that you’re complaining about the OP having no life, when you’re whining about someone on the internet thinking about things you never bothered to think about. Kind of a nice irony, there. I bet you’d feel differently if, say, in Fallout 4, you couldn’t side with the Railroad unless you were playing as a woman.

      I agree with you, Ben. Major plot possibilities or elements shouldn’t be limited to one gender over the other. That means that anyone playing the ‘limited’ gender has fewer possibilities. Lots of people like playing through the Fallout games multiple times, and seeing virtually everything the game has to offer. You limit that if they like playing as a female character. And that’s just stupid.


  2. This seems a bit ridiculous.

    The Legion is the “evil” faction of Fallout New Vegas, you’re supposed to hate them and their ideals to move the plot along and to qualify as a villain.

    You’re complaining that the Legion is doing bad things? Gee, I would have never known. Usually the first time you meet the Legion is in Nipton where they burnt the town to the ground and executed everyone there and yet this is the biggest issue to you? This is what makes you think “Oh man, these guys are bad, we oughta do something”? Get over yourself.

    TL;DR Bad guys are supposed to do bad things.


  3. DoktaC4ibby: You’re missing the point, it is not “Gee, the Legion sure is doing something evil not letting women fight in the arena!” but rather, “Gee, the Legion doesn’t allow the woman PC to participate in its arena, and while that matches with the Legion’s ideals in the story, it means a person playing a woman will not get to experience a small piece of the plot.” Especially since they /do/ make exceptions to their ideal that women do not fight.

    TL;DR Bad guys do bad things, but developers stop half their players from experiencing content.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s